To: "Wahl, Eugene R" <email@example.com>, "Jonathan Overpeck" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: Wahl and Ammann Climatic Change article on MBH
Date: Wed Feb 22 08:53:55 2006
Cc: "Eystein Jansen" <email@example.com>
Thanks for this Eugene. It has been very difficult in drafting the 2000-year section text
for us to get the balance between too much concentration on the controversy as you call it
and the need to describe subsequent work. Sounds like your paper is an important one to
signpost in the text.
At 00:26 22/02/2006, Wahl, Eugene R wrote:
Here is the mss. Yes, fingers crossed. Note, this is not for general
dissemination until actually "in press".
The article is quite long, due to all the MM issues we address and the
extensive discussions concerning use of validation measures we get into.
As a first pass, the Abstract, Discussion, and Summary would be good
places to start.
Dr. Eugene R. Wahl
Asst. Professor of Environmental Studies
1 Saxon Drive
Alfred NY, 14802
From: Jonathan Overpeck [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Wahl, Eugene R
Cc: Keith Briffa; Eystein Jansen
Subject: Re: Wahl and Ammann Climatic Change article on MBH
Hi Gene - might be better to send the ms now - at least to Keith,
since final text is being worked out now. Fingers crossed, thanks,
>The re-revised mss. of the Wahl-Ammann article on the MBH-MM
>is now to Stephen Schneider of Climatic Change for his approval.
>It is possible that we might hear from him within days. If so, and the
>decision is full approval of "in press" status, I will let you all know
>immediately. At that time I also will send the mss. itself.
Professor Keith Briffa,
Climatic Research Unit
University of East Anglia
Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K.