To: Keith Briffa <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: email #5: paper in review in J. Climate letters using NCAR forced simulation and RegEM
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:56:56 -0500
here (w/ the supplementary info also attached) is the paper summarizing the results I
showed in Victoria of the RegEM analysis of pseudoproxies in the forced CSM simulation.
This is in review as a "letter" in Journal of Climate, and can be referred to as
"submitted" in the zero-order draft.
As we discussed, parallel experiments are being done using the MBH98 method, but regardless
of those results, this suggests, at least, that the RegEM-based NH reconstructions (e.g. in
the Rutherford et al paper you're co-author on) are unlikely to be impacted by the bias
discussed by von Storch et al...
Professor Michael E. Mann
Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22903
e-mail: email@example.com Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137
Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\pseudoproxy-jclimlett1.pdf" Attachment Converted: